AI-verified — may contain errors. The verdicts and explanations on this page are generated automatically by AI. Always check the sources.

← Back to the article
Fact check

Powerful 7.6-magnitude earthquake hits Panama and triggers tsunami warnings

The Guardian Read the original

7.0 / 10 Partly supported

The score shows how well the checked facts are backed by independent sources at the time of the check. It is not a verdict of absolute truth, and not a rating of the publisher.

Medium confidence How is this calculated?

12 facts found in the article, 8 checked

Article published

Checked with claude-haiku-5-5.

All checks of this article

Contradicted by other sources

  1. Contradicted The earthquake was centered about 14km (9 miles) south-west of the remote community of Pitaloza Arriba, near the southern tip of Panama.

    AI The claim gives 14 km, but the USGS event page reports 12 km WSW of Pitaloza Arriba, and other results report 10 km (6 miles) SW. Only the CBS report's 9-mile figure is consistent with the claim.

  2. Contradicted The Institute of Geosciences of the University of Panama said the quake struck just before 1pm local time near the southern town of Tonosí.

    AI The Institute of Geosciences' location near Tonosí is supported by several results, but Newsroom Panama reports the quake struck at noon, which is incompatible with the claim's 'just before 1pm'. The results do not give the Institute's exact timing, so the time conflict rests on that single report.

Verified facts

  1. Confirmed A 7.6 magnitude earthquake struck Panama, according to the US Geological Survey (USGS).

    AI Euronews and KTVQ both explicitly report a 7.6-magnitude quake in Panama according to the USGS. Some results give other figures: NBC's headline says 7.7, and USA Today says the USGS first reported a preliminary 8.0, so the magnitude was revised across reports.

  2. Confirmed Panamanian president José Raúl Mulino asked a key minister to call for calm and wrote on X that the event should not be used to generate alarm and disorder.

    AI Multiple results report Mulino's X post saying the event should not be used to cause alarm or disorder. The results say he asked Minister Dinoska Montalvo for a report on the impact, not that he asked her to call for calm, so that part of the claim is not supported.

  3. Confirmed Penonomé's St John Baptist Cathedral and other buildings suffered severe damage, and a highway west of the capital was sheared in half by the earthquake.

    AI Multiple results report a partial collapse and cracks at the cathedral in Penonomé's main square and serious damage to a church and other buildings there, which supports the core of the claim. The results do not mention the cathedral's name (St John Baptist) or a highway being sheared in half; they only describe road cracks in Veraguas.

  4. Confirmed Omar Smith of Panama's National Civil Protection Service said damage was concentrated in Veraguas, Herrera and Los Santos provinces and there were no reports of damage in Panama City.

    AI Multiple results (OPB, LA Times, NBC News, DW) explicitly attribute to Omar Smith of the National Civil Protection Service the statement that damage was concentrated in Veraguas, Herrera and Los Santos provinces, and that there were no reports of damage in the capital (Panama City). The exact wording 'central provinces' and the 'capital' reference are consistent with the claim.

  5. Confirmed The USGS said hazardous waves were possible along the coasts of Costa Rica, Ecuador, Peru, Nicaragua, Guatemala, El Salvador and Mexico, and the tsunami warning for Chile was cancelled at 4.18pm local time.

    AI The Straits Times and Jerusalem Post report that the US tsunami warning system said hazardous waves were possible along coasts including Costa Rica, Ecuador, Peru, Nicaragua, Guatemala, El Salvador and Mexico, and the Jerusalem Post headline attributes this to USGS. None of the results mention the cancellation of Chile's tsunami warning or the 4:18pm time, so that detail could not be checked.

Could not verify

No independent source settled these either way. That doesn’t mean they are wrong.

  1. Unverified A second 6.0 magnitude earthquake struck Panama at 1.22pm, soon after the first quake.

    AI The only search result is an Internet Archive page for a 1974 issue of The Times, and its snippet contains nothing about a Panama earthquake, its magnitude, or its timing. The results do not address the core of the claim.

Not checked

We check a limited number of facts per article to keep the service free. These don’t count towards the score.

Author’s assumptions

Predictions or inferences in the article. They can’t be fact-checked.

Opinions

Views and judgements, the author’s or someone quoted. Not fact-checked.

How we handle corrections

Report an error