Vérifié par IA — peut contenir des erreurs. Les verdicts et explications de cette page sont générés automatiquement par l’IA. Vérifiez toujours les sources.

← Retour à l’article
Vérification

Justice Department urges sanctions for database analysis critical of its noncitizen voting claims

PBS NewsHour Lire l’original

8.0 / 10 Partiellement étayée

Le score indique dans quelle mesure les faits vérifiés sont étayés par des sources indépendantes au moment de la vérification. Ce n’est ni un verdict de vérité absolue, ni une note attribuée au média.

Fiabilité élevée Comment est-ce calculé ?

13 faits trouvés dans l’article, 8 vérifiés

Article publié

Vérifié avec claude-haiku-5-5 · Méthode 2026-10-10.

Faits vérifiés

  1. Confirmée On Friday, U.S. District Court Chief Judge James Boasberg allowed the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA) access to federal government data on 20,000 people the Trump administration alleges are noncitizen voters in California.

    IA The VRP press release and the Bloomberg Law report both say Chief Judge James Boasberg ordered the DOJ to give CHIRLA and the UCLA Voting Rights Project access to the list of more than 20,000 California registrants alleged to be noncitizens, after a Friday hearing (October 30, 2026, which was a Friday). The VRP item is a party's own statement, and the Bloomberg item may draw on the same order, so they are not fully independent. The results do not address the exact wording of the 'data' access, but the core facts match.

  2. Confirmée On Saturday, attorneys for CHIRLA filed court papers stating that their analysis found more than 40% of the people on the list do not appear in California's state voter file.

    IA Multiple results report that a CHIRLA and UCLA project analysis found 8,880 names, 42% of the DOJ list, do not correspond to anyone in California's current voter file, which matches the claim's core figure and finding. The results do not explicitly mention the court filing or the attorneys' wording, and they all appear to repeat the same underlying analysis, but the core claim is supported.

  3. Confirmée CHIRLA's analysis identified 22 people on the list who were likely naturalized U.S. citizens.

    IA The ABC News wire report states that CHIRLA's court filing 'identified 22 people on the list who were likely naturalized U.S. citizens,' which matches the claim directly. Democracy Docket and the Immigration Analytics snippet report the same 22 figure, though they describe it as 'at least 22' and attribute the work to UCLA analysts Barreto and Rios as well as CHIRLA. These sources appear to rely on the same court filing, so they are not fully independent.

  4. Confirmée The Justice Department said in a Sunday filing that the CHIRLA analysis had nothing to do with the group's legal standing and therefore violated Boasberg's order.

    IA Results 1 and 2 both report that the Justice Department said in a Sunday filing that the CHIRLA analysis had nothing to do with the group's standing and therefore violated Boasberg's order, matching the core of the claim. Both appear to be the same wire report, so they are not independent confirmations. Result 3 says outside experts did not claim DOJ violated the order, but that concerns a different party's assessment, not the DOJ filing, so it is not a contradiction.

Non vérifiables

Aucune source indépendante ne les a confirmées ni démenties. Cela ne veut pas dire qu’elles sont fausses.

  1. Non vérifiée The Justice Department on Sunday defended the accuracy of its list of more than 20,000 suspected noncitizens registered to vote in California.

    IA None of the search results address the Justice Department defending a list of more than 20,000 suspected noncitizens registered to vote in California. The Congressional Record excerpt discusses a survey (the CCES) of about 20,000 people and a study about noncitizens who voted, which is a different subject, and the other results are unrelated.

  2. Non vérifiée Judge James Boasberg ordered the plaintiffs not to disclose any names on the list and to use the data only for arguments about their legal standing.

    IA The results describe Boasberg ordering DOJ to give the list of alleged noncitizen voters to CHIRLA's lawyers so they could check for members, but none mention any order restricting plaintiffs from disclosing names or limiting use of the data to standing arguments. Silence on these restrictions is not a contradiction, so the claim cannot be confirmed or refuted from these results.

  3. Non vérifiée The Justice Department's Sunday filing suggested Boasberg refer the matter to the Justice Department for investigation for possible criminal contempt of court.

    IA None of the search results mention Judge Boasberg, a Justice Department Sunday filing, or a suggested criminal contempt referral. The results cover general topics such as the presumption of regularity, congressional letters, litigation trackers, and immigration, so the core of the claim is not addressed.

  4. Non vérifiée Alberto Lammers, a spokesman for UCLA's Voting Rights Project, said in an emailed statement that "Plaintiffs' counsel and their experts fully complied with the Court's orders."

    IA The only relevant result shows Alberto Lammers as the author of a UCLA Voting Rights Project post about the California Supreme Court ballot-return order, but it does not contain the quoted emailed statement or say that Plaintiffs' counsel complied with the Court's orders. Nothing in the results addresses the core of the claim, and nothing contradicts it.

Non vérifiées

Nous vérifions un nombre limité de faits par article pour que le service reste gratuit. Elles ne comptent pas dans le score.

Hypothèses de l’auteur

Prévisions ou déductions de l’article. Elles ne peuvent pas être vérifiées.

Comment nous traitons les corrections

Signaler une erreur